Tip of the Month

 
Home Page

U p d a t e s
 
Tip of the Month
 
Tip of the Month Archive

T i p s
 
Equipment 101
 
Mixing Tips
(Introduction to Beat Mixing)
 
Scratching Tips
 
About Nightclubs (Tips)
 
Formatting Tips

O t h e r
 
Links
 
SCC DJ Classes MySpace Page
 
Subscribe to the Disc Jockey 101 Quarterly Tip (Free)
 
Contact Disc Jockey 101
 
Link to Disc Jockey 101
 
Privacy Statement

 

Review: Doug Shannon's "Off The Record: The Handbook to Knowledge, Money, and Success"

November 2002

Before the emergence of "DJ culture" and "superstar DJ's," Doug Shannon authored one of the world's first "how to DJ" books: Off The Record: The Handbook to Knowledge, Money, and Success. First published in 1982 by Pacesetter Enterprises (and now out of print), Off The Record is intended for those interested in the nightclub business.

The key word here is "business." When you take the time period into context - the end of the disco era - it's easy to understand why Shannon places so much emphasis on the synergy between the DJ and a club's financial success. For example, Shannon believes that because disco "depends on self-gratification [via expressive dance movements], the disco industry has a great deal of stability" (p. 141). Notwithstanding the irony that disco "died" roughly that same year, Shannon does reflect the thinking of the typical disco-era club owner.

What is this mode of thinking? During the disco era, nightclubs thrived on dancing (usually to the latest disco hit, or to try the latest disco dance). As a result, the club owners invested heavily in sound, lights (Shannon calls light jocks "lighting orchestraters"), and records. In fact, there was so much emphasis on dancing, that some nightclubs paid DJ's bonuses based on sales per customer.

Shannon believes that a nightclub's environment should be so dominant that a patron will forget about his or her problems (p. 152). The DJ assists this process by immersing the customers with aural stimulation. According to Shannon, "if the volume of the dance music is increased, while the low (bass) frequencies are accentuated and the midrange and high (treble) frequencies are attenuated, more people will dance" (p. 153). Moreover, "the highs should be at a lower volume than the lows" (p. 158).

"Club DJ's are entertainers," Shannon writes, "if the attendance is at least three times the capacity of the dance floor ... the floor should be filled a large portion of the night" (pp. 176-177). However, Shannon does note that it's unrealistic to expect people to dance at the same time on any particular night.

A successful DJ "should boost attendance within a period of three months or so." Thus, it's important to get return customers. This is accomplished, as Shannon puts it, by "working just as hard to have them to return as it was to entice them to attend in the first place" (p. 177).

While Shannon's book has areas that are incompatible with today's clubbing environment - such as the section featuring disco dance step lessons - the book is a treasure-house of classic clubbing tips. After reading this book, you may get the feeling that many of these concepts have been forgotten.


Addendum To Last Month's Tip: The 16" Record

Special thanks to Jason Hart for submitting additional information to last month's Tip of the Month, which addressed how rpm differences led to beat matching. As discussed, to get more music on one disc the labels introduced slower "long-playing" records (LP's). In addition, as Mr. Hart points out:

33 1/3 records were first introduced in 1926 by the film industry on 16 inch discs because they ran the same time as a film reel. They were synchronized with the film, giving us "The Jazz Singer" a year later, and ending the era of silent film. These were acetate/shellac discs. Sometime in the early-30's, another company "introduced" this same format for early syndicated radio shows. So, in 1948, Columbia really just followed something that already existed in professional markets (the difference probably being the 1 mil needle used in those earlier formats). I guess Columbia's decision to go with this speed was due to existing hardware. Last time I looked, someone was still manufacturing a turntable for these archival 16 inch discs.
.

i

All materials © 2000-2002 Disc Jockey 101, unless otherwise noted. Unauthorized use prohibited.
External sites are not endorsed or controlled by Disc Jockey 101.